Skip to Content

IDWR denies stay on water curtailment, leaving Butte County crops at risk

KIFI

BUTTE COUNTY, Idaho (KIFI) — The Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) has denied a motion to pause a curtailment order, forcing groundwater irrigators in the Big Lost and Little Lost basins to shut off their spouts despite already having crops in the ground.

IDWR Director Matt Weaver finalized the decision after a Wednesday status meeting between state officials and water districts, upholding a shutdown order that the Idaho Ground Water Appropriators (IGWA) warns will be devastating for local agriculture.

While all parties have agreed to an expedited technical review to potentially allow the districts to join the 2024 Stipulated Mitigation plan, restoring their water access, IGWA argues the process could take weeks, time farmers say they do not have.

RELATED: IDWR launches technical review to resolve Butte County curtailment, Surface Water Coalition appluads path forward

The Core of the Conflict

The shutdown stems from Idaho’s "prior appropriation" doctrine, which dictates that senior water rights holders (those with older claims) must get their full allocation of water first, before junior groundwater right holders.

Following a statewide drought declaration in April 2024, senior surface water users in the Surface Water Coalition (SWC) issued "delivery calls" for their water.

Under Senate Bill 1341, junior groundwater users in the Big and Little Lost basins were required to join an approved mitigation plan to avoid curtailment. Because these three districts failed to join an approved mitigation plan by the November 2025 deadline, they were subject to IDWR curtailment orders to protect senior rights.

In a news release, SWC President Alan Hansten supported efforts for additional groundwater districts to join the 2024 Mitigation Plan but emphasized that the process must be "done right," following legal requirements and ensuring fair treatment for those already in the plan.

“The 2024 Mitigation Plan was the result of months of negotiation between senior surface and junior groundwater users, with the goal of protecting all Idaho water users. The process to adjust this plan needs to be done right,” Hansten said. “We are committed to moving forward with decisions based on sound data and consistent standards to ensure the success of the 2024 Mitigation Plan and the longevity of practical water management.”

Farmers Claim "Good Faith" Efforts

However, IGWA claims these farmers followed every legal step to join the 2024 Stipulated Mitigation Plan, but the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) and the Surface Water Coalition (SWC) are blocking their inclusion.

While critics have argued that the districts had months to prepare and created the crisis themselves, IGWA argues the timeline reflects steady progress, not delay.

"We had to build everything from scratch—form a district, seat a board, hire an attorney, and vote to join a mitigation plan," said Kirk Nickerson, Chairman of the Little Lost River Ground Water District. "We did every single thing that was asked of us, and we did it in good faith."

They argue that the denial of the stay in curtailment pending good faith negotiations is equivalent to holding the irrigation districts "hostage."

According to IGWA, the SWC refused to agree to a temporary stay in curtailment if one of its own members, the A&B Irrigation District, is excused from its own mitigation requirements.

A&B has proposed a separate plan that IGWA argues would require a "fraction" of the mitigation expected of other groundwater users. IGWA characterizes this demand as "unfair and unequal treatment under the law."

"Right now, there are farmers in Butte County who planted crops in good faith, completed every required step, and still can't turn on a pump,” said IGWA Executive Director Lara Herway. “That's not a water law problem – IGWA acted in good faith. Our members acted in good faith. The only party that hasn't is the one blocking an agreement that's already signed."

What Happens Now?

All parties are scheduled to reconvene on May 4, 2026, for a follow-up status conference to go over the findings of the technical review and determine the next steps for the 2024 Mitigation Plan.

Local News 8 has reached out to representatives for the Surface Water Coalition for comment on Director Weaver's decision and will update this story pending their response.

Article Topic Follows: News

Jump to comments ↓

Author Profile Photo

Seth Ratliff

Seth is the Digital Content Director for Local News 8.

BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION

KIFI Local News 8 is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation.

Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here

If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here.