Skip to Content
Idaho Politics

Legislation aims to kill 90% of wolves roaming Idaho

BOISE, Idaho (AP) - A Republican-dominated state Senate committee on Tuesday approved legislation allowing the state to hire private contractors to kill about 90% of the wolves roaming Idaho.

The Senate Resources and Environment Committee voted 6-2 with no Democratic support to approve the agriculture industry-backed bill that includes substantial other changes intended to cut the wolf population from about 1,500 to 150.

Backers said there are too many wolves in Idaho and they're attacking cattle, sheep and wildlife, costing agriculture producers hundreds of thousands of dollars and reducing the number of deer and elk available for hunters.

Opponents said the legislation threatens a 2002 wolf management plan involving the federal government that could ultimately lead to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service taking back control of managing the state's wolves.

The Idaho Department of Fish and Game reported in February that the wolf population has been holding at about 1,500 the past two years. The numbers were derived by using remote cameras and other methods.

About 500 wolves have been killed in the state in each of the last two years by hunters, trappers and wolf control measures carried out by state and federal authorities.

A primary change in the new law is the hiring of private contractors to kill wolves. The legislation includes increasing the amount of money the Idaho Department of Fish and Game sends to the Idaho Wolf Depredation Control board from $110,000 to $300,000. The board, created in 2014, is an agency within the governor's office that manages state money it receives to kill wolves.

"For the cattle industry, our priority really revolves around opening up the Wolf Depredation Control Board to contract with private individuals and enabling the free-market system to take place and create more efficiencies in actually controlling those wolf populations," Wyatt Prescott of the Idaho Cattle Association told lawmakers.

Other changes in the legislation include removing any limit on the number of wolf tags issued to a hunter, meaning there would be no restriction on how many wolves one person is allowed to kill. Wolves, though, have proved difficult to find and kill for the vast majority of hunters and trappers.

The legislation also combines a hunting tag with a trapping and snaring tag, meaning only one tag is needed for those combined methods. Wolf trapping would be allowed year-round on private land.

In addition, the legislation makes changes to allow hunting wolves with ATVs and snowmobiles, methods allowed for animals classified as predators, such as coyotes. Also, state agencies outside of Idaho would be allowed to kill wolves in Idaho.

"Could you tell me if there's anything that's not allowed as far as the take of wolves?" Democratic Senate Minority Leader Michelle Stennett asked the bill's sponsor, Republican Sen. Van Burtenshaw, after he finished listing the proposed changes to state law in the bill.

"There's nobody in this group that wants to wipe out the wolves completely," Burtenshaw said. "We want to manage the wolves, we want them to be not wiped out, that's not our plan here, but to be managed to a level that we can deal with the issues that are ahead of us, and that is depredation."

Specifically, Burtenshaw cited Idaho's 2002 wolf conservation and management plan. The plan calls for at least 150 wolves and 15 packs. He said the state is allowed to increase the killing of wolves to reach that level. If the wolf population falls below 150, the killing of wolves would have to be reduced.

If Idaho's wolf population fell to 100, there's a possibility the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could resume management of its wolf population. The 2002 document says wolf management could revert to what was in place when wolves were listed under the Endangered Species Act.

Jonathan Oppenheimer of the Idaho Conservation League testified that the Legislature was treading on territory that's the responsibility of the Idaho Fish and Game Commission to set wildlife policy.

"That's a significant concern for our members, and I think for many Idahoans," he said. "Ultimately we see this as potentially inviting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to return in a management capacity within the state of Idaho."

Animals / Breaking News / Idaho / Local News / News / Top Stories / Videos

Associated Press

Comments

4 Comments

  1. For once, I hope the federal gov’t steps in with some sanity. Crying ranchers tend to be full of BS and just want dead wolves.
    Most wolf packs kill sick and injured wild game, and this upsets the lazy hunter, not the rancher.

    1. Crying ranchers? Ranchers, the folks who put food on America’s tables, are way too underrepresented. I’ll bet 2/3 of the population of Idaho has never even witnessed a sheep/cow give birth. But they are the people making legislation.
      It’s interesting to me all the effort that our ancestors went to to eliminate wolves because of the harm they caused to their lives and livelihoods and the next generation determines that our ancestors were wrong, reintroduce wolves, and then ignore the “cries” of the folks making a living just as their own ancestors did.

  2. The reason Idaho is dealing with this problem is because the government caved in to the ridiculous idea that we needed to bring the wolves back. Wolf packs do not prey primarily on the sick and weak. They don’t look at a herd of sheep and say “Man guys, I’m really hungry, but none of these sheep look sick or weak, I guess we’ll just have to wait”. Wolves will kill it if they can catch it. In fact many times they will kill animals and leave them uneaten. When a population of 1500 wolves requires 250-300 deer a day just to feed itself, it takes a toll on the deer and elk population.

  3. How can trapping still be legal? It’s a cruel way to kill any animal. And who decided that 150 wolves is plenty? I personally oppose all hunting but this legislation is especially egregious. I would not impose my beliefs on hunting on the rest of the population but I hope the Federal government steps in and overturns this insanity.

Leave a Reply

Skip to content