Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Idaho
Canva
Counties where children have the best opportunity for economic mobility in Idaho
Americans have long understood that their birthplace can significantly affect their futures, and academics have increasingly been able to connect tangible early life factors like where they live and the friendships they’ve cultivated with potential future income.
Among the most recent studies shedding light on what’s known as economic mobility—a person’s ability to move themselves and their families up the socioeconomic ladder over their lifetime—are a series of papers authored by Harvard University researchers leveraging vast troves of social networking data.
As part of a national analysis, Wealth Enhancement Group used data from Harvard University‘s Social Capital Atlas project to identify where in Idaho children have the best (and worst) chances at upward economic mobility.
The research draws on a privacy-protected dataset representing 21 billion friendships from Facebook made public through its parent company Meta’s Data for Good project. It also uses anonymous tax records, according to the authors. The scholars assigned a score to locales according to how economically connected low- and high-income people living in the area have historically been over at least a decade, per that data. The dataset does not include scores for about 180 of the 3,000 or so counties in the U.S.
The research attempts to fill in the gaps of previous efforts to study American economic mobility that did not consider a person’s vast social networks nor their importance in creating better lives for themselves and their children.
It turns out the ability to cultivate friendships linking people of different socioeconomic backgrounds with one another is the strongest factor in determining whether a child can surpass the earning potential of their parents, Harvard researchers found. They call this economic connectedness.
Read on to find out where economic connectedness is strongest in your state.
Canva
#42. Jerome County
– Economic connectedness: 0.56
– Median Income: $61,280
– Population: 24,081
— 81.4% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
Canva
#41. Power County
– Economic connectedness: 0.64
– Median Income: $52,116
– Population: 7,854
— 75.8% white
— 0% Black
— 5.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Canva
#40. Minidoka County
– Economic connectedness: 0.66
– Median Income: $56,140
– Population: 21,393
— 81.2% white
— 0.1% Black
— 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.2% Asian
Canva
#39. Lincoln County
– Economic connectedness: 0.67
– Median Income: $55,988
– Population: 5,184
— 82.1% white
— 0% Black
— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.5% Asian
Canva
#38. Gooding County
– Economic connectedness: 0.68
– Median Income: $56,734
– Population: 15,422
— 83.4% white
— 0% Black
— 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Norm Lane // Shutterstock
#37. Benewah County
– Economic connectedness: 0.7
– Median Income: $50,257
– Population: 9,509
— 85.5% white
— 0.8% Black
— 8.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.1% Asian
Canva
#36. Owyhee County
– Economic connectedness: 0.71
– Median Income: $54,669
– Population: 11,815
— 76.4% white
— 0.4% Black
— 3.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.2% Asian
Canva
#35. Cassia County
– Economic connectedness: 0.71
– Median Income: $57,547
– Population: 24,469
— 83.3% white
— 0.1% Black
— 1.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.4% Asian
Canva
#34. Payette County
– Economic connectedness: 0.72
– Median Income: $59,540
– Population: 24,928
— 84.5% white
— 0.2% Black
— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.7% Asian
Canva
#33. Clearwater County
– Economic connectedness: 0.72
– Median Income: $50,787
– Population: 8,719
— 91.5% white
— 0.3% Black
— 1.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.6% Asian
jfergusonphotos // Shutterstock
#32. Shoshone County
– Economic connectedness: 0.73
– Median Income: $43,188
– Population: 13,124
— 92.1% white
— 0.8% Black
— 1.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Canva
#31. Washington County
– Economic connectedness: 0.75
– Median Income: $45,065
– Population: 10,425
— 85.6% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.2% Asian
Canva
#30. Nez Perce County
– Economic connectedness: 0.77
– Median Income: $61,810
– Population: 41,820
— 88.9% white
— 0.1% Black
— 5.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.9% Asian
Canva
#29. Canyon County
– Economic connectedness: 0.77
– Median Income: $60,716
– Population: 227,367
— 78.4% white
— 0.6% Black
— 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
melissamn // Shutterstock
#28. Lewis County
– Economic connectedness: 0.8
– Median Income: $44,028
– Population: 3,613
— 82.3% white
— 1.1% Black
— 5.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.2% Asian
Canva
#27. Idaho County
– Economic connectedness: 0.8
– Median Income: $47,508
– Population: 16,494
— 92.8% white
— 0.1% Black
— 3.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.5% Asian
Canva
#26. Twin Falls County
– Economic connectedness: 0.81
– Median Income: $57,430
– Population: 89,128
— 85.6% white
— 0.7% Black
— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.6% Asian
Tucker James // Shutterstock
#25. Bingham County
– Economic connectedness: 0.82
– Median Income: $63,106
– Population: 47,540
— 80.1% white
— 0.1% Black
— 5.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.5% Asian
MKStyle // Shutterstock
#24. Gem County
– Economic connectedness: 0.83
– Median Income: $59,957
– Population: 18,692
— 86.1% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0.7% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.4% Asian
Canva
#23. Boundary County
– Economic connectedness: 0.83
– Median Income: $51,261
– Population: 11,966
— 91.5% white
— 0.2% Black
— 1.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.4% Asian
Canva
#22. Adams County
– Economic connectedness: 0.86
– Median Income: $52,746
– Population: 4,321
— 94.2% white
— 0.1% Black
— 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Canva
#21. Bannock County
– Economic connectedness: 0.86
– Median Income: $56,472
– Population: 86,362
— 87.1% white
— 0.8% Black
— 2.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.9% Asian
Canva
#20. Elmore County
– Economic connectedness: 0.87
– Median Income: $48,475
– Population: 28,396
— 78.6% white
— 2.6% Black
— 2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2.8% Asian
Canva
#19. Boise County
– Economic connectedness: 0.88
– Median Income: $64,125
– Population: 7,549
— 91.5% white
— 0.2% Black
— 0.4% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.7% Asian
Canva
#18. Bonner County
– Economic connectedness: 0.89
– Median Income: $55,206
– Population: 46,481
— 92.6% white
— 0.3% Black
— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.7% Asian
Canva
#17. Custer County
– Economic connectedness: 0.89
– Median Income: $47,663
– Population: 4,273
— 89% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
davidrh // Shutterstock
#16. Butte County
– Economic connectedness: 0.89
– Median Income: $41,552
– Population: 2,573
— 94.8% white
— 0% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Canva
#15. Lemhi County
– Economic connectedness: 0.89
– Median Income: $46,105
– Population: 7,948
— 93.5% white
— 0% Black
— 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.2% Asian
Canva
#14. Bonneville County
– Economic connectedness: 0.9
– Median Income: $64,928
– Population: 121,771
— 88.2% white
— 0.4% Black
— 0.5% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.9% Asian
Canva
#13. Kootenai County
– Economic connectedness: 0.91
– Median Income: $64,936
– Population: 168,317
— 90.9% white
— 0.3% Black
— 1.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.8% Asian
Canva
#12. Blaine County
– Economic connectedness: 0.92
– Median Income: $71,749
– Population: 23,868
— 84.5% white
— 0.5% Black
— 0.9% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.9% Asian
Canva
#11. Valley County
– Economic connectedness: 0.94
– Median Income: $67,528
– Population: 11,476
— 97.5% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.1% Asian
Canva
#10. Fremont County
– Economic connectedness: 0.96
– Median Income: $61,875
– Population: 13,370
— 92.9% white
— 0.4% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.2% Asian
Canva
#9. Caribou County
– Economic connectedness: 0.98
– Median Income: $65,528
– Population: 7,003
— 94% white
— 0% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Canva
#8. Bear Lake County
– Economic connectedness: 0.99
– Median Income: $60,337
– Population: 6,327
— 94% white
— 0.2% Black
— 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Charles Knowles // Shutterstock
#7. Ada County
– Economic connectedness: 0.99
– Median Income: $75,115
– Population: 485,246
— 87.6% white
— 1.3% Black
— 0.6% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2.6% Asian
Canva
#6. Franklin County
– Economic connectedness: 1.02
– Median Income: $56,677
– Population: 14,036
— 92.5% white
— 0% Black
— 1.1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.1% Asian
B Brown // Shutterstock
#5. Jefferson County
– Economic connectedness: 1.02
– Median Income: $69,097
– Population: 30,427
— 89.1% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0.3% Asian
Canva
#4. Teton County
– Economic connectedness: 1.03
– Median Income: $75,837
– Population: 11,490
— 86% white
— 0% Black
— 1.8% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Canva
#3. Oneida County
– Economic connectedness: 1.04
– Median Income: $64,766
– Population: 4,514
— 95.5% white
— 0.1% Black
— 0.3% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 0% Asian
Danita Delimont // Shutterstock
#2. Latah County
– Economic connectedness: 1.08
– Median Income: $56,673
– Population: 39,464
— 89.9% white
— 1.2% Black
— 1% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 2.2% Asian
Canva
#1. Madison County
– Economic connectedness: 1.28
– Median Income: $53,498
– Population: 50,979
— 91.5% white
— 0.5% Black
— 0.2% American Indian and Alaska Native
— 1.5% Asian
This story features data reporting and writing by Dom DiFurio and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.
This story originally appeared on Wealth Enhancement Group and was produced and
distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio.
