Skip to Content

Colorado voters emphasize January 6 violence as they urge Supreme Court to keep Trump off the ballot

By JoanĀ Biskupic, Devan Cole and Marshall Cohen, CNN

(CNN) — The Colorado voters trying to disqualify Donald Trump from the state ballot told the Supreme Court on Friday that the violence the former president provoked on January 6, 2021, qualifies as an insurrection under the terms of the Constitution andĀ bars him from holding future office.

Lawyers for the group of voters filed their brief several days before theirĀ deadline of next week, seeking to forcefully respond to Trumpā€™s legal arguments that the President is excluded from the disputed section of the 14th Amendment.

ā€œThe most violent attack on our nationā€™s Capitol since the War of 1812 ā€” an attack which obstructed the peaceful transfer of presidential power for the first time in American history ā€” meets any plausible definition of ā€˜insurrection against the Constitution,ā€™ā€ the challengers wrote.

Specifically responding to Trumpā€™s leading argument in his brief filed last week, that the president is not an ā€œofficerā€Ā under the terms of the Constitution, the votersā€™ lawyers wrote, ā€œSection 3 does not give a free pass to insurrectionist Presidents; they are ā€˜officersā€™ because they hold an ā€˜office.ā€™ And statesā€™ broad authority to regulate presidential elections allows them to exclude constitutionally ineligible candidates from the ballot.ā€

Section 3 bars certain elected officials, including an ā€œofficer of the United States,ā€ from holding ā€œany officeā€ in the futureĀ if they have ā€œengaged in insurrectionā€ or aided a rebellion.

In the early pages of their 60-page filing, they also countered Trump lawyersā€™ warning of the ā€œbedlamā€ that could follow if the justices were to allow states to block his name from upcoming primary ballots.

ā€œHe not-so-subtly threatens ā€˜bedlamā€™ if he is not on the ballot,ā€ the lawyers,Ā led by Jason Murray, wrote. ā€œBut we already saw the ā€˜bedlamā€™ Trump unleashed when he was on the ballot and lost. Section 3 is designed precisely to avoid giving oath-breaking insurrectionists like Trump the power to unleash such mayhem again.ā€

The challengers alsoĀ largely reframed the case toward Trumpā€™s ā€œinsurrectionistā€ actions.Ā They showedĀ the justicesĀ photos from January 6 and Trump tweets, as theyĀ described how Trump ā€œincited a violent mobā€ that injured more than 140 police officers and forced lawmakers to ā€œflee for their lives.ā€

Among the photos incorporated was the image of US Capitol Police Officer Daniel Hodges writhing in pain while being squished in a Capitol doorway. He testified in-person at the Colorado disqualification trial about his experience on January 6, including the wounds he suffered during theĀ hours-long battle at the Lower West TerraceĀ of the Capitol.

The votersā€™ lawyers wrote that the mob ā€œinfiltrated the (US Capitol) building through shattered windowsā€ and ā€œerected gallowsā€ outside, while chanting ā€œHang Mike Pence.ā€ They noted that video of the day was on file at the court.

The challengers said Trump zeroed in on January 6 after his election-related lawsuits failed, ā€œincluding in this Court.ā€ That reference was to his ill-fated and short-lived Supreme Court case in December 2020 ā€“Ā Texas v. PennsylvaniaĀ ā€“ which sought to throw out Joe Bidenā€™s legitimate victories in several battleground states.

Oral arguments in the Colorado case are scheduled for February 8.

The Supreme Court agreed earlier this month to hear the case of Trump v. Anderson, accepting the former presidentā€™s appeal of the Colorado Supreme Court decision that removed him from that stateā€™s ballot.

Returning repeatedly to Trumpā€™s conduct, the challengers in their brief even compared Trump to a ā€œmob bossā€ while arguing that his fiery words at the January 6 rally at the Ellipse werenā€™t protected by the First Amendment.

ā€œThe idea that Trumpā€™s words were unlikely to incite imminent lawlessness, even though Trump intended them to do so and even though they in fact did so, fails even the most forgiving of red-face tests,ā€ the challengers wrote. ā€œFor obvious reasons, the First Amendment does not protect mob bosses who deliberately incite violence through thinly veiled language they know their audience will understand.ā€

Trumpā€™s lawyers claim his speech was shielded by longstanding First Amendment precedents because it wasnā€™t trying to incite imminent violence. The Colorado trial judge disagreed, and her findings were upheld by Coloradoā€™s high court, which concluded that he ā€œintended that his speech would result in the use of violence.ā€

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Article Topic Follows: CNN - US Politics

Jump to comments ↓

Author Profile Photo

CNN Newsource

BE PART OF THE CONVERSATION

KIFI Local News 8 is committed to providing a forum for civil and constructive conversation.

Please keep your comments respectful and relevant. You can review our Community Guidelines by clicking here

If you would like to share a story idea, please submit it here.

Skip to content